Morality As Anti-Nature Essay - 747 Words

MORALITY AS ANTI-NATURE TARGET AUDIENCE: 10TH GRADERS IN TOMAHAWK PURPOSE: TO SUMMARIZE Friedrich Nietzsche, a prominent German philosopher in the 19th century is one of the most well-read philosophers of the past two-centuries. His ideas regarding morality and nature continue to be discussed and debated to this day among scholars of all beliefs. All living things are given desires by nature. These desires exist as part of who we are. They define us in a way; they can aid us and they can also do us great harm. The cardinal sin of Pride, for instance, can be a good thing, to have pride in yourself and your abilities, and be able to brag about them may be what stands between you and another person applying for the same job. But†¦show more content†¦Throughout his writings, Nietzsche aims to inform his readers that we as humans can only reach our potential by following our passions and ignoring the flawed ideals of the church. Under the doctrine of the church’s morality, innate passions of its followers must be abolished in order to b ecome proper Christians. By destroying the inner passions of its followers, the church is doing a great disfavor by using morality to rule out nature from their lives. When someone begins to follow the ideals of the church, they are introduced with the doctrine of the idea of free will. Basically, this concept claims that even if God is an all righteous and all powerful being, only â€Å"his† followers have the ultimate responsibility for their actions. As human beings, we have a certain weakness to make great mistakes. This is where Nietzsche claimed that there is a case of cause and effect. At the time of his writing, Friedrich Nietzsche saw that when events were not proven scientifically, followers of the church were very naà ¯ve to credit an act of God rather than searching for the answers differently. Christianity had become the enemy of life and nature and the church has stifled its followers by turning them into closed minded and weak humans. Nietzsche ultimately be lieved that religion creates a concept of anti-natural morality which damages our development as humans quiteShow MoreRelatedReligion And Religious Laws On Religion975 Words   |  4 PagesSome of the religious rules have put limits on humans that go completely against human nature. This because we as humans are consider as mammals and animals as well Although there are many positive views of religion there are also many negative aspects to religious laws. For centuries, religion has put limits on its followers by denying their passions for many reasons. Religion teaches everyone what’s morality good and what bad in life. They put certain rules that they want everyone to agree withoutRead MoreEducation And Morality On Their Lives1118 Words   |  5 Pagestogether sometimes education and morality on their lives. Success is the way where people reach their goals toward something specific that they desire in their lives. I choose Freire and Nietsche because they talk about Education and Morality as anti-Nature and they fit on my idea of success. I consider education as an important part on my way to success in this world. Education gives me knowledge that I require to overcome the problems every day. Morality as Anti-Nature helps me not to do things thatRead MoreMorality : Oppressed By Religion Or Born From It?849 Words   |  4 PagesMorality: Oppressed by Religion or born from it? â€Å"Morality as Anti-Nature† is a piece written by a German philosopher by the name of Friedrich Nietzsche. A majority of Nietzsche’s works attacked the idea of religion, especially that of Christianity. He believes that humans are essentially good, that morals are instinctive, and we have a natural process of learning how to be moral without the rules put in place by religion. In his piece â€Å"Morality as Anti-Nature† he makes his point that religion isRead More Views of Slavery and Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreaus Works1725 Words   |  7 PagesHenry David Thoreaus Works Two men, similar in their transcendentalist beliefs and yet so different in their methods of expressing their beliefs on handling the issues of society, were major voices in the anti-slavery movement. While their focuses are more on the subjects of morality and individual choice, they still reflect on how slavery should be addressed by the American people, American referring to the free whites who actually make the decisions. Ralph Waldo Emerson is highly regardedRead MoreSongs of Innocence and Songs of Experience by William Blake Essay example1126 Words   |  5 Pagesthemes of romanticism, Carroll crafts a story that is anti-didactic by its very nature. Before defending such claims, it’s necessary to expand on what values were held by the Romantics. To quote David Sandner â€Å"In Romantic works, the adult moves from teacher to student, from stern moralizing to the undisciplined child to patient listening to the wise instruction of the simple and imaginative child.† Romanticism was a movement that championed both nature and the imagination of children as a creative forceRead MoreComparison of Philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and the Dalai Lama1030 Words   |  5 Pageslooking at the lives of two men who embody the two controversial ideals of science and religion one can look at the lives and views of His Holiness the Dalai Lama (views on compassion surrounding religion) and Friedrich Nietzsche (views on Morality as Anti-Nature surrounding science). Dalai Lama through his reading seems to establish the concept that compassion is a guide for ethical behavior, while Nietzsche strives to develop the concept that mora l pronouncements by major religions are designedRead MoreAyn Rand s Anthem, The Banishment Of Individualism And Self Interest1534 Words   |  7 PagesAyn Rand’s Anthem challenges the prevailing wisdom that selflessness and sacrifice are morally superior to selfishness and self-interest. In the 1937 novel, Rand depicts a future in which individual identity is erased and all action is collective in nature. The word ‘I’ has been eradicated and all people use the plural ‘We’ to refer to themselves, as it is the concept of self that a society based on selflessness must destroy. In Anthem, the banishment of individualism leads to severe dystopian consequencesRead MoreIssues and Intolerance of Sexual Minorities in Arizona1625 Words   |  7 Pagesvalues language instead of anti-marriage stipulation, the bill was revived through manipulation of the rules and passed through the House of Representatives. The Senate passed the bill as SB1038, and was signed by Governor Symington on May 5th, 1996 (www.datalounge.com). Other laws that have been formerly used for the purpose of anti-gay discrimination were 13-1411 and 13-1412, both of which were very recently repealed. 13-1411 was the notorious crime against nature law, which punished homosexualRead MorePlato s Allegory Of The Cave Essay1630 Words   |  7 Pagesreligion as Plato. In â€Å"Morality as Anti-Nature,† the Twilight of the Idols author identifies himself among other â€Å"immoralists and anti-Christians† (Nietzsche 466) to interrogate the conception of what should be. According to Nietzsche, aside from direct actions resulting in concern for oneself, designations like should apply to the field of morality. It could be said that organized religion has helped sustain the mythic possibility of truth through morality. Morality serves as a criterionRead MoreWho Really Possesses The Right?1402 Words   |  6 Pagesclaim that anti-abortionists are flawed in their reasoning. The anti-abortion theory of the sanctity of life is based heavily on morality, but this reasoning becomes absurdity when faced with the concern of a fetus. To understand why many oppose abortion, we must understand the concept of the sanctity of life. This is the belief that every life is sacred and holy. That we as an intelligent race are obligated to uphold this false sense of reality that every single life is a miracle of nature. Despite

The, The Whiteness Of The Whale - 1818 Words

Throughout his novel, Moby Dick, Herman Melville will often devote entire chapters to the thoughts and actions of specific characters. Two specific examples of this type of chapter are Chapter 36, The Quarter-Deck, and Chapter 42, The Whiteness of the Whale. The first of these chapters depicts Ahab addressing his crew for the first time in order to convince them to hunt down Moby Dick. The second offers insight to the fear that is brought upon by the mere mention of Moby Dick The significance and effectiveness of each of these chapters are enhanced by Melville’s use of rhetoric and style respectively. In Chapter 36, Ahab finally chooses to reveal the true purpose of this whaling voyage: To hunt down and kill Moby Dick. He does so through a grandiose speech in which he rallies almost the entire crew to his cause through a number of persuasive techniques. Ahab begins his speech by asking the crew a few basic questions about whaling. These questions lay out the basic purpose of this voyage: To hunt whales. In doing so, Ahab is laying the groundwork to convince the crew to hunt down a very specific whale: Moby Dick. In addition, the call-and-response used in this portion of the speech unifies and excites the crew, thereby making them more open to what Ahab is about to say. Immediately following this, Ahab reveals his desire to kill the White Whale and offers an ounce of gold to the first man to spot it. This use of bribery piques the interest of the crew and offers anShow MoreRelatedEssay about The Whiteness of the Whale878 Words   |  4 PagesThe Great White Whale and its Many Meanings Herman Melville, in his epic novel Moby-Dick, utilizes the symbolism of the color of the Great White Whale to demonstrate his theme of duality. However, Captain Ahab tragically had a single mind set towards Moby Dick, as he believed that the whale was the symbol of the worlds evil and had to be destroyed. On the other hand, Ishmael sees that the color white can mean many various and opposing things. It would be dangerous to settle upon any one singleRead MoreMoby Dick Themes1171 Words   |  5 PagesKnowledge As Ishmael tries, in the opening pages of Moby-Dick, to offer a simple collection of literary excerpts mentioning whales, he discovers that, throughout history, the whale has taken on an incredible multiplicity of meanings. Over the course of the novel, he makes use of nearly every discipline known to man in his attempts to understand the essential nature of the whale. Each of these systems of knowledge, however, including art, taxonomy, and phrenology, fails to give an adequate account.Read MoreAnalysis Of The Book Moby Dick Starts 949 Words   |  4 Pageschapter by Ishmael, â€Å"What and where is the skin of the whale?† (Melville 274) Ask anyone where the skin of an animal is that is in front of him or her and they would simply point downward to where the animal is, exclaiming, â€Å"right there on top.† But Ishmael wants to know everything about the whale. He wants to know about every layer and marking on the beast. In chapter 68 Ishmael talks about the skin of t he whale, calling it a blanket, â€Å"for the whale is indeed wrapt up in his blubber as in a real blanketRead More The Whale as Symbol in Moby Dick Essay1226 Words   |  5 PagesThe Whale as Symbol in Moby Dick That there are various perspectives to the white whale as symbol is a result of the value which Melville accords the symbol as a medium of expression. Melville regarded the symbol as, what William Gleim terms, a means of both revelation and concealment(402). Visible objects are as masks through which one can educe universal and significant order. The eyes are windows(Melville, 9) through which one can see a little into the springs and motivesRead MoreCaptain Ahab And Ishmaels Visions Of Moby Dick1680 Words   |  7 Pagesclearest indication the reader receives about Ahab’s understanding of the whale is when Ishmael narrates when and how Ahab and the book’s namesake first clashed. During the fateful battle with the animal – during which Ahab lost his limb – Ishmael tells the reader that Ahab â€Å"dashed at the whale†¦blindly seeking with his six-inch blade to reach the fathom-deep life† and end it (Melville 156). Before Ahab can succeed in doing so, the whale â€Å"suddenly sweeping his sickle-shaped lower jaw†¦reaped away Ahab’s leg†Read MoreWhiteness and Citizenship971 Words   |  4 PagesCaptain Ahab’s eulogy of whiteness shows that the word â€Å"white† implies more than a chromatic description. â€Å"White† is an untenable perfection that has haunted the American psyche since colo nial times. The idea of â€Å"white spiritual superiority† can only be enforce by a terrorist politico-legal system, based on brutalizing the non-whites and creating a national fantasy. A national fantasy defined by Lauren Berlant as the means â€Å"to designate how national culture becomes local through the images, narrativesRead MoreThe Symbolism Of A Voyage Gone Wrong1725 Words   |  7 PagesGabriel is one of a growing list that foretells the death and destruction of Ahab and his crew is they choose to pursue Moby Dick and attempt to kill the white whale. The various prophets, Gabriel from the Jeroboam and Elijah from the docks of Nantucket, have no connection to each other yet both say Ahab will die at the jaws of the whale. Elijah says what s to be, will be; and then again, perhaps it won t be, after all...Some sailors or other must go with him, I suppose...God pity em† to QueequegRead MorePerception: the True Meaning of Identity1716 Words   |  7 Pagespers everance of clinging to belief is seen in Herman Melville’s Moby Dick. In this classic whaling tale, the Peqoud crew is joined together by a common belief shared by their Captain Ahab that fuels their determination to venture out and kill a white whale they call Moby Dick. Captain Ahab is introduced as a godless man who has witnessed the countless evils that encompass our world and forms a â€Å"God† complex as a result of these experiences. His overly cocky nature and innate lack of fear for death makesRead More Evil in the Works of Melville and Emerson Essay1736 Words   |  7 Pagesstruggle does not take place solely within his tortured mind. It is played out before the reader, his mind (his madness?) actively involving the lives and fates of others as well as challenging the very forces of nature. The White Whale swam before him as the monomaniac incarnation of all those malicious agencies which some men feel eating in them... all evil, to crazy Ahab, were visibly personified in Moby Dick (MelvilleRead MoreMoby Dick And Slavery As Its Parallel1526 Words   |  7 PagesSpermaceti oil was harvested from Sperm Whales used as an energy source for light and many more essential parts of people’s lives (â€Å"What Products†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ). Whaling was an extremely dangerous and brutal practice that involved the inhumane capture and torture of essentially harmless creatures. â€Å"...the harpooner plunged his barbed weapon into the whale s back...At this moment of danger, the crew backed the boat away, as the whale thrashed in pain...When the whale tired, the crew pulled on the line to draw

Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Samuel Rutherford Free Essays

In 1642 England was starting to seek for changes in the way their government was set up. John Locke and Samuel Rutherford were the leaders of this change, calling for the removal of an absolute monarch. Their works would be opposed by the ideas of Thomas Hobbes, during this eighteen-year civil war in England. We will write a custom essay sample on Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Samuel Rutherford or any similar topic only for you Order Now The ideas represented in this period would heavily influence the way England’s government would be set up in the eighteenth century. In 1644 Bishop Ross, also known as John Maxwell, published Sacro-Sancta Regum Majestas. The article’s ideas centered on Calvinist resistance theory and the political theory of Spanish neo-scholastics. In response Samuel Rutherford came out with his publication, Lex Rex, which translates to â€Å"Law is King†. This was the first document proposing rule by law and consisted of 44 questions. In Rutherford’s opinion, power was immediately from God in root. With that being his focus he concluded that not only should the king not be above the law but should also be subject to it. Lex Rex is the â€Å"Greatest work on the foundation, nature and constitutional government, the Civil Magistrate, and the separate but mutual relationship of Church and State† (Ford). The contents of Lex Rex develop the idea of a separation of powers between legislative, executive and judicial functions. They are to balance one another in no particular order to combine the best features of monarchic, aristocratic and democratic forms of government. He believes that the real sovereign is the people and that all government officials, including the monarch, should be subject to the rule of law and the rule of men as well. A monarch is contrary to God’s will because it requires subjects to surrender total control to a fallible ruler. The position of an absolute ruler is an intoxicating and corruptive force that would potentially lead to negative outcomes. The implementation of laws and government serving as a check upon the ruler would be in the best interest of the people (Auchter). In his preferred government the King’s power would be lost when he violates the law because it is a right and even more a duty for the people to resist such an infraction. The ideas contributed in Lex Rex provided a bridge between early natural law philosophers and those who would further develop these ideas. The ublication planted the seeds to the type of government that would be laid not only in England but in America as well. Shortly into his reign as king, Charles II made it illegal to own a copy of the publication and had them all burned. There are only four confirmed copies left today. John Locke was a philosopher and political theorist from England. He is greatly known for his contributions to liberalism and empiricism. His faith relied in that of human reasoning and believed that just societies were those, which infringed minimally on natural rights and freedoms of its subjects. He claimed that a legitimate government depended on the consent of those being governed. This philosophy was taken greatly into consideration when the founding fathers were drawing up the United States’ Declaration of Independence. Locke was known to preach private property and limited government. Locke’s association with Anthony Cooper (First Earl of Shaftesbury) led him to become successively a government official charged with collecting information about trade and colonies, economic writer, opposition political activist, and and finally a revolutionary whose cause ultimately triumphed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688 (Uzgalis). Locke’s two major contributiong pieces of work are Two Treatises of Government and Essay Concerning Human Understanding. In Two Treatises of Government, Locke claims that the sovereignty resides in the people and he explains that humans naturally lived in a state of absolute freedom and quality with no government of any sorts. The earliest form of humans only had to follow the law of Nature. During this time individuals allowed themselves to follow their own rights to life, liberty and property. It was soon realized that the contrary outweighed the productive. From this, a civil society was established based on absolute equality and set up a government to settle disputes that would arise in their type of society. The government’s power, however, was not made to be absolute. The power of the government was meant to be surrendered to the people themselves and its authority was contractual with applied conditions. If these conditions were overstepped or abused society has the right to rid of it and create another. With Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Locke offered the first great defense to empiricism. The publication has to do with determining the limits of human understanding in respect to a wide variety of topics. The main focuses, however, is sensation and reflection. With sensation our senses focus toward the world and subconsciously receive information. Within reflection the focus is on our mind itself and how it passively receives ideas. This all originates back to our sense of perception. He felt as if our minds were a black tablet, tabula rasa, and that only when we, as infants, start to experience things do our senses to perceive the external world register in our minds. This focus reflected upon the goodness and perfectibility of humanity. His theory had radical implications that, if all humans were capable of reason, education may be able to spread to level of hierarchies of status, race or sex. Much of Locke’s other works had to do with opposition to authority, while his main focus was to use reason to search after truth rather than simply accept the opinion of authority or be subject to suspicion. Thomas Hobbes was the young contemporary of Jean Bodin, though he had contrasting views than him. He was in support of absolute monarchy as he heavily thought that a king was absolutely necessary to protect the subjects of his land. He, like Locke and Rutherford, wrote many great pieces during his life. The two that relate are Elements of Law Natural and Political and Leviathan, his most major piece. Hobbes’ Elements of Law Natural and Political was a direct product of the intellectual and political conflict going on during the seventeenth century. During the time it was written, Parliament was fighting for power against King Charles I. In this writing he claims that society could only function if it is submitted to the governance of an absolute sovereign. His work was accepted with hostility causing him to flee to Paris where he would use this work as the basis to Leviathan. After the execution of Charles I, Hobbes started writing Leviathan. It is composed into four books; â€Å"Of Man†, â€Å"Of Common-wealth†, â€Å"Of a Christian Common-wealth† and â€Å"Of the Kingdome of Darkness†. No differently than Elements of Law Natural and Political, his work was received with hostility as it offended both Loyalists and Parliamentarians. Even the exiled Prince Charles, who Hobbes had tutored, refused to read the document after seeing how the general public reacted to it. The method in Leviathan is modeled after a geometric proof, founded up principles of; each step of argument makes conclusions based upon the previous step. Conclusions derived by Geometry are indisputable because each step itself is indisputable. In Leviathan he wanted to base his philosophy off of irrefutable evidence [, therefore, making it fact] (Sparknotes). Hobbes believed that any form of government capable of protecting its subjects’ lives and property might act as an all-powerful sovereign. The state exists to rule over individuals and is thus licensed to trample over both liberty and property if the government’s survival was at stake. The people must surrender their liberties to a sovereign ruler in exchange for his obligations to keep the peace since man naturally â€Å"behaves like a wolf†. Now, having traded away their liberties, subjects have no right to win them back and the sovereign could rule as he pleased, free to oppress his subjects in any way except to kill them. The sovereign’s main purpose would be to preserve the people of their rights. He felt that if the king could not protect his subjects they were to be free from obedience. While Locke and Rutherford’s ideas are centered toward a limited monarchy contrasts with Hobbes’ beliefs of an absolute monarchy is the way to go, there is one thing they all agree upon. None of them believes that the King should be in one hundred percent control. Rutherford suggests that the executive’s (the king’s) decision have to go through a system of checks and balances with a judicial and legislative branch before it can be made permanent. Locke did not believe in a king at all, but rather than total control of a government. He did, however, agrees that if the government were to overstep its boundaries the people could rid of it in order to create another. While Hobbes’ case is a stretch, due to his strong belief in an absolute sovereign, he believed that if a king could not protect his subjects they were to be free from his obedience. Shortly after these documents were presented King Charles I was beheaded. Cromwell became in control as a monarch until his death when his generals seized power, calling for election of a new parliament. Charles II was soon restored to the throne but did not take on absolute authority. He agreed to follow the Petition of Right, agreeing that Parliament would meet at least once every three years. England had thus emerged from this great civil war as a limited monarch which were the ideas suggested by Locke and Rutherford. The works of these three men had a great effect on England’s government. After King Charles I was executed, Hobbes came out with Leviathan pleading for an absolute sovereign, which was immediately taken up by Oliver Cromwell. However, it was the words of John Locke and Samuel Rutherford that prevailed in setting up the limited monarchy that came after and still exists in England and also ended up being the bases to the ideas that the United States constitution was based on. How to cite Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Samuel Rutherford, Papers